I’ve spent a lot of time training kata and studying bunkai. It is really at the center of my training, at least mentally or intellectually. When I think about karate, I’m usually thinking about bunkai.
The dojo I came up in had many many kata, something like 30
kata all told. As I discussed in my post of the Flexible Bunkai Model, I
think there were several reasons for this and I’ve continued to train a number
of those kata beyond the 8 classical Goju-ryu forms.
However, what I’ve stopped trying to do is decipher
bunkai for those kenkyu or research kata. I’m sure I could slap together
something obvious (and have had to do that before for testing), but I don’t
believe it would be close to the Core Bunkai I would want, the ones the
kata was built around.
For Goju-ryu, I think I have enough of a map to find those
Core Bunkai. For example, Goju-ryu bunkai will usually have you move off the
line of attack, get in close to control the attacker, and finish with a strike
to or twisting of the head and neck. This is the Goju-ryu strategy – Counter,
Close, Control.
I don’t know if Shorin-ryu or the other Okinawan styles
follow this strategy, so while I may be able to apply it for a few moves, I’m
not sure if it gets me closer to the essence of those kata.
One thing you see with Goju-ryu is that the kata movements
are quite similar across kata. Goju kata have a lot of opening and closing
hands (grabbing techniques), striking with the forearm, and very few kicks,
mostly kansetsu-geri to the knee. This doesn’t seem to be what is
happening in Sochin or Anaku. Those Shorin forms are much… lighter? With a
springiness and snap and lots of body movement… it’s clearly a different style.
Which brings me to another problem with deciphering
non-Goju-ryu bunkai: Even if I could determine a strategy governing some of
these kata, would be it be same strategy for every Shorin kata? I can
see some similarities between Sochin and Anaku… but is it the same for
Naihanchi? Jion?
I do not know enough about the history of these kata to
parse it out, but here is a major advantage for Goju-ryu: the classical kata
were grouped together by one person, the founder, Chojun Miyagi. The individual
kata are certainly older than the style, and of all different ages, but Miyagi
and his Sensei, Kanryo Higashionna, grouped them together and passed them along
as a single style.
To me, this is evidence that there should be some
similarity between the bunkai across different Goju-ryu kata – and there is! I
can’t say if the kata of other Okinawan styles will have similar connections
between them. I also need to do more work tracing back where the kata I learned
come from, I’ve been using “Shorin forms” as a catchall term, but that’s a
broad brush.
I am fortunate that Goju-ryu has this depth to it. Clearly
there is a lifetime of study here for me. And so while I enjoy and still train
the non-Goju kata, I am wary of bunkai experts who freely analyze across
styles. It may provide a good starting point for analysis, but there is no
substitute for long term study of a specific style.
Comments
Post a Comment